BDCX vs. AMNA
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA).
BDCX and AMNA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BDCX is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. AMNA is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2020. Both BDCX and AMNA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BDCX or AMNA.
Correlation
The correlation between BDCX and AMNA is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BDCX vs. AMNA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BDCX:
0.80
AMNA:
3.73
BDCX:
1.17
AMNA:
5.15
BDCX:
1.15
AMNA:
1.69
BDCX:
1.00
AMNA:
9.32
BDCX:
3.17
AMNA:
33.60
BDCX:
4.30%
AMNA:
1.44%
BDCX:
17.02%
AMNA:
12.97%
BDCX:
-34.96%
AMNA:
-18.83%
BDCX:
-2.63%
AMNA:
-5.20%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a 12.53% return, which is significantly lower than AMNA's 44.30% return.
BDCX
12.53%
-0.01%
0.37%
12.94%
N/A
N/A
AMNA
44.30%
-5.12%
25.68%
44.02%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BDCX vs. AMNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMNA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BDCX vs. AMNA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BDCX vs. AMNA - Dividend Comparison
BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.67%, more than AMNA's 4.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 15.67% | 14.71% | 17.46% | 11.52% | 6.32% |
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN | 4.32% | 5.61% | 5.48% | 5.84% | 2.13% |
Drawdowns
BDCX vs. AMNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, which is greater than AMNA's maximum drawdown of -18.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and AMNA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BDCX vs. AMNA - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) at 4.19%. This indicates that BDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.