BDCX vs. LINT
BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BDCX is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
BDCX vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.
BDCX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- -13.68%
- 6M
- -10.71%
- 1Y
- -17.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- —
LINT
- 1D
- -12.86%
- 1M
- 11.99%
- YTD
- 744.89%
- 6M
- 773.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDCX vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | -13.68% | 7.05% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 744.89% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCX and LINT is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDCX vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank
BDCX
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDCX vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDCX | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDCX vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDCX | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -49.54% | +14.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.85% | -12.86% | -16.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.21% | -20.48% | +10.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.05% | — | — |
Volatility
BDCX vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDCX | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.74% | 168.83% | -141.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.58% | 168.83% | -142.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 168.83% | -141.93% |
BDCX vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDCX vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than LINT's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 20.73% | 19.17% | 15.28% | 14.71% | 17.47% | 11.52% | 6.32% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.10% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDCX and LINT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDCX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDCX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.
They also come from different issuers: UBS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BDCX and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for BDCX and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer