BDCX vs. COMT
BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDCX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. BDCX is passively managed, while COMT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BDCX returned 2.33%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for COMT. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
BDCX vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 38.58% return.
BDCX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -8.85%
- 1Y
- -13.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- 38.58%
- 6M
- 38.42%
- 1Y
- 47.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
BDCX vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | -8.64% | -10.42% | 15.32% | 35.33% | -17.67% | 52.70% | 24.50% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 38.58% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 36.88% | 13.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCX and COMT is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.17 |
The correlation between BDCX and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDCX vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
BDCX
COMT
BDCX vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDCX | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | 2.22 | -2.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | 2.86 | -3.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.39 | -0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 6.26 | -6.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 14.93 | -15.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDCX | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 | 2.22 | -2.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.65 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.20 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
BDCX vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDCX | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -51.89% | +16.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.46% | -8.02% | -22.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.39% | -13.31% | -20.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | -29.00% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.75% | -5.56% | -20.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.05% | -24.08% | +14.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.06% | 3.36% | +13.70% |
Volatility
BDCX vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) is 6.41%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that BDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDCX | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 7.60% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.02% | 18.80% | +3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.90% | 21.38% | +5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.44% | 21.07% | +5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 18.89% | +7.96% |
BDCX vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDCX vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.59%, more than COMT's 5.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 19.59% | 19.17% | 15.28% | 14.71% | 17.47% | 11.52% | 6.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.59% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDCX and COMT have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to BDCX (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 13.58% vs 2.33% for BDCX. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, BDCX has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 2.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BDCX.
BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 19.59%, compared with 5.59% for COMT.
BDCX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BDCX and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDCX and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer