BDBT vs. TIIV

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BDBT (Bluemonte Core Bond ETF) and TIIV (AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDBT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Bluemonte, while TIIV is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by AAM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BDBT returned 2.16% vs 30.97% for TIIV. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BDBT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for TIIV.

Performance

BDBT vs. TIIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDBT achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than TIIV's 15.51% return.

BDBT

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -0.66%
• 6M: -0.23%
• YTD: -0.13%
• 1Y: 2.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.19%

TIIV

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 4.64%
• 6M: 7.56%
• YTD: 15.51%
• 1Y: 30.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	$774.67K	$800.04K	$1.18M
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF	$20.03K	$14.77K	$75.33K

BDBT vs. TIIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	-0.13%	3.53%
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF	15.51%	10.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BDBT and TIIV is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

BDBT vs. TIIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BDBT

BDBT Risk / Return Rank: 22
BDBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BDBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
BDBT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
BDBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BDBT Martin Ratio Rank: 23

TIIV

TIIV Risk / Return Rank: 82
TIIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
TIIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
TIIV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
TIIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
TIIV Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BDBT vs. TIIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BDBT	TIIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	2.16	-1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	3.12	-2.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.40	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	3.21	-2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.83	11.21	-9.38

BDBT vs. TIIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the TIIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDBT and TIIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BDBT vs. TIIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDBT drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum TIIV drawdown of -9.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDBT and TIIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDBT	TIIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-9.68%	+6.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.88%	-9.68%	+6.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	0.00%	-1.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.85%	-1.77%	+0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.18%	2.77%	-1.59%

Volatility

BDBT vs. TIIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) is 1.16%, while AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that BDBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDBT	TIIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	3.57%	-2.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.07%	12.03%	-8.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.80%	14.43%	-10.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.87%	14.47%	-10.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.87%	14.47%	-10.60%

BDBT vs. TIIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDBT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than TIIV's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDBT vs. TIIV - Dividend Comparison

BDBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than TIIV's 3.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	3.95%	2.21%
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF	3.08%	2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDBT and TIIV in my portfolio?

BDBT and TIIV have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BDBT or TIIV?

TIIV has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to BDBT (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDBT dropped -2.88% vs TIIV's -9.68%.

Which ETF is better, BDBT or TIIV?

On 1-year performance, TIIV leads with 30.97% vs 2.16% for BDBT. On fees, BDBT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, BDBT has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BDBT or TIIV?

Over the 1-year period, TIIV has performed better with a 30.97% return vs 2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDBT or TIIV?

BDBT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TIIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDBT or TIIV?

BDBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 3.08% for TIIV.

What is the main difference between BDBT and TIIV?

BDBT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while TIIV is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and AAM. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BDBT and 0.54% for TIIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TIIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.