BCX vs. ECAT
BCX (Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust) and ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) are both mutual funds - BCX is a Commodity Producers Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while ECAT is a Derivative Income fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 3 years, BCX returned 18.43%/yr vs 19.24%/yr for ECAT. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for ECAT.
Performance
BCX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCX achieves a 12.68% return, which is significantly higher than ECAT's 11.23% return.
BCX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- 12.68%
- 6M
- 17.92%
- 1Y
- 37.66%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
ECAT
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 6.84%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 20.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCX Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust | 12.68% | 40.37% | 3.18% | -4.79% | 12.80% | 5.12% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 11.23% | 16.64% | 19.96% | 32.36% | -21.90% | -6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCX and ECAT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank
BCX
ECAT
BCX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust (BCX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 1.77 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 6.65 | +0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.56 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.55 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
BCX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCX drawdown since its inception was -62.36%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCX and ECAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.36% | -32.23% | -30.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -11.80% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.17% | -15.79% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.30% | -1.20% | -9.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.64% | -9.11% | -10.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.34% | 3.14% | +2.20% |
Volatility
BCX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison
Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust (BCX) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) at 3.31%. This indicates that BCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 3.31% | +2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.12% | 10.59% | +5.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.44% | 13.44% | +5.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 16.90% | +4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.52% | 16.90% | +6.62% |
BCX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison
BCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, less than ECAT's 21.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCX Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust | 6.95% | 7.62% | 7.49% | 7.00% | 5.52% | 5.13% | 7.10% | 7.67% | 8.77% | 6.19% | 6.98% | 11.38% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 21.71% | 23.00% | 17.44% | 9.14% | 8.94% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCX and ECAT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to ECAT (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCX dropped -62.36% vs ECAT's -32.23%.
BCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCX and ECAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer