PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCSVX vs. WGROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCSVX vs. WGROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSVX achieves a -10.01% return, which is significantly lower than WGROX's 2.75% return. Over the past 10 years, BCSVX has underperformed WGROX with an annualized return of 7.38%, while WGROX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.77% annualized return.


BCSVX

1D
1.57%
1M
2.60%
YTD
-10.01%
6M
-10.72%
1Y
-18.84%
3Y*
1.18%
5Y*
-3.36%
10Y*
7.38%

WGROX

1D
0.69%
1M
2.68%
YTD
2.75%
6M
0.89%
1Y
-0.02%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
10.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCSVX vs. WGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCSVX
Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund
-10.01%-2.30%8.17%20.04%-31.56%12.69%44.75%26.41%-3.39%36.56%
WGROX
Wasatch Core Growth Fund
2.75%-10.37%13.13%33.43%-30.86%20.76%36.73%33.31%-3.75%24.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSVX and WGROX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.53

The correlation between BCSVX and WGROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCSVX vs. WGROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCSVX
BCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

WGROX
WGROX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
WGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
WGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCSVX vs. WGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCSVXWGROXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.08

-0.03

-1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.47

0.10

-1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.01

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

-0.04

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.06

-0.09

-0.97

BCSVX vs. WGROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCSVX Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the WGROX Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCSVX and WGROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCSVXWGROXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.08

-0.03

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.03

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.46

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.55

-0.10

Drawdowns

BCSVX vs. WGROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSVX drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, smaller than the maximum WGROX drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSVX and WGROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSVXWGROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.93%

-61.61%

+17.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.35%

-15.89%

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.35%

-27.61%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.93%

-40.16%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.93%

-40.16%

-3.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.03%

-16.65%

-8.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.11%

-9.89%

-2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.75%

6.31%

+10.44%

Volatility

BCSVX vs. WGROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) is 4.48%, while Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that BCSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCSVXWGROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

5.37%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.78%

14.05%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

19.17%

-2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

22.99%

-4.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

23.33%

-6.20%

BCSVX vs. WGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCSVX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than WGROX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCSVX vs. WGROX - Dividend Comparison

BCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than WGROX's 8.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCSVX
Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund
0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.07%0.74%0.30%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WGROX
Wasatch Core Growth Fund
8.32%8.55%9.22%0.00%0.71%16.82%7.21%10.73%10.14%6.24%0.15%12.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCSVX and WGROX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WGROX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to BCSVX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSVX dropped -43.93% vs WGROX's -61.61%.

WGROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCSVX and WGROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer