BCSVX vs. RLY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BCSVX (Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund) and RLY (SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both funds - BCSVX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Brown Capital Management, while RLY is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by State Street. Over the past 10 years, BCSVX returned 7.11%/yr vs 8.25%/yr for RLY. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCSVX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.

Performance

BCSVX vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSVX achieves a -12.20% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 14.36% return. Over the past 10 years, BCSVX has underperformed RLY with an annualized return of 7.11%, while RLY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.25% annualized return.

BCSVX

• 1D: -1.98%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: -12.20%
• 6M: -13.19%
• 1Y: -21.09%
• 3Y*: 0.19%
• 5Y*: -3.92%
• 10Y*: 7.11%

RLY

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: 14.36%
• 6M: 16.24%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 9.85%
• 10Y*: 8.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCSVX vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund	-12.20%	-2.30%	8.17%	20.04%	-31.56%	12.69%	44.75%	26.41%	-3.39%	36.56%
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	14.36%	20.26%	2.53%	2.56%	7.86%	22.85%	-0.59%	15.63%	-11.72%	10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSVX and RLY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between BCSVX and RLY has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BCSVX vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCSVX

BCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

RLY

RLY Risk / Return Rank: 91
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCSVX vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCSVX	RLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.24	2.73	-3.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.71	3.69	-5.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.51	-0.70
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.65	7.16	-7.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	25.86	-27.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCSVX vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCSVX Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the RLY Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCSVX and RLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCSVX	RLY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.24	2.73	-3.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	0.73	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.60	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.36	+0.07

Drawdowns

BCSVX vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSVX drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, which is greater than RLY's maximum drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSVX and RLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCSVX	RLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.93%	-37.75%	-6.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.35%	-3.93%	-28.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.35%	-10.08%	-22.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.93%	-18.94%	-24.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.93%	-34.17%	-9.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.86%	-3.93%	-22.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.13%	-9.45%	-2.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.02%	1.09%	+15.93%

Volatility

BCSVX vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison

Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) at 3.47%. This indicates that BCSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCSVX	RLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	3.47%	+1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.96%	8.46%	+5.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.02%	10.34%	+6.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.68%	13.57%	+5.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	13.83%	+3.31%

BCSVX vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCSVX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCSVX vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

BCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than RLY's 2.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.07%	0.74%	0.30%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	2.93%	3.24%	3.31%	3.71%	5.66%	12.15%	2.16%	3.45%	2.76%	1.85%	2.07%	1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCSVX and RLY in my portfolio?

BCSVX and RLY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCSVX or RLY?

BCSVX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to RLY (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSVX dropped -43.93% vs RLY's -37.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.