BCSVX vs. DBMF

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

BCSVX (Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both funds - BCSVX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Brown Capital Management, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Over the past 5 years, BCSVX returned -3.78%/yr vs 8.59%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCSVX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

BCSVX vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSVX achieves a -11.15% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 11.26% return.

BCSVX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 4.52%
• 6M: -9.86%
• YTD: -11.15%
• 1Y: -23.24%
• 3Y*: -1.35%
• 5Y*: -3.78%
• 10Y*: 7.25%
• ALL TIME*: 7.46%

DBMF

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 0.57%
• 6M: 8.74%
• YTD: 11.26%
• 1Y: 26.79%
• 3Y*: 9.43%
• 5Y*: 8.59%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCSVX vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund	-11.15%	-2.30%	8.17%	20.04%	-31.56%	12.69%	44.75%	3.50%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	11.26%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSVX and DBMF is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019	0.07

The correlation between BCSVX and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (5 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BCSVX vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCSVX

BCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 0
BCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 88
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 90
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCSVX vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCSVX	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.35	2.13	-3.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.91	2.81	-4.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.44	-0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	4.41	-5.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	14.93	-16.15

BCSVX vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCSVX Sharpe Ratio is -1.35, which is lower than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCSVX and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCSVX vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSVX drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSVX and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCSVX	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.93%	-20.39%	-23.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.35%	-6.10%	-26.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.35%	-15.60%	-16.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.93%	-20.39%	-23.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.98%	-1.03%	-24.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.29%	-6.50%	-5.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.05%	1.80%	+17.25%

Volatility

BCSVX vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.69%. This indicates that BCSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCSVX	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	2.69%	+2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.72%	10.05%	+4.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.28%	12.63%	+4.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.80%	12.45%	+6.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.04%	12.37%	+4.67%

BCSVX vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCSVX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCSVX vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

BCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than DBMF's 5.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.07%	0.74%	0.30%	0.31%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.11%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCSVX and DBMF in my portfolio?

BCSVX and DBMF have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCSVX or DBMF?

BCSVX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to DBMF (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSVX dropped -43.93% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.