BCSVX vs. COWZ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BCSVX (Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both funds - BCSVX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Brown Capital Management, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Over the past 5 years, BCSVX returned -3.92%/yr vs 10.11%/yr for COWZ. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCSVX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.

Performance

BCSVX vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSVX achieves a -12.20% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 6.41% return.

BCSVX

• 1D: -1.98%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: -12.20%
• 6M: -13.19%
• 1Y: -21.09%
• 3Y*: 0.19%
• 5Y*: -3.92%
• 10Y*: 7.11%

COWZ

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 6.41%
• 6M: 7.19%
• 1Y: 19.32%
• 3Y*: 13.26%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCSVX vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund	-12.20%	-2.30%	8.17%	20.04%	-31.56%	12.69%	44.75%	26.41%	-3.39%	36.56%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	6.41%	8.98%	10.64%	14.73%	0.19%	42.57%	11.65%	23.41%	-10.05%	20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSVX and COWZ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016	0.43

Return for Risk

BCSVX vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCSVX

BCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 64
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCSVX vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCSVX	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.24	1.74	-2.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.71	2.58	-4.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.31	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.65	3.88	-4.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	10.52	-11.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCSVX vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCSVX Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCSVX and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCSVX	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.24	1.74	-2.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	0.58	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.64	-0.20

Drawdowns

BCSVX vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSVX drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSVX and COWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCSVX	COWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.93%	-38.63%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.35%	-5.00%	-27.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.35%	-22.00%	-10.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.93%	-22.00%	-21.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.86%	-2.53%	-24.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.13%	-4.80%	-7.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.02%	1.84%	+15.18%

Volatility

BCSVX vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.92%. This indicates that BCSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCSVX	COWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	2.92%	+2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.96%	7.21%	+6.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.02%	11.16%	+5.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.68%	17.64%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	19.92%	-2.78%

BCSVX vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCSVX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCSVX vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

BCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than COWZ's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.07%	0.74%	0.30%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	1.94%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCSVX and COWZ in my portfolio?

BCSVX and COWZ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCSVX or COWZ?

BCSVX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to COWZ (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSVX dropped -43.93% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.