BCSKX vs. FYHTX
BCSKX (BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K) and FYHTX (Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds - BCSKX tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return while FYHTX tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BCSKX returned 11.08%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for FYHTX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCSKX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FYHTX.
Performance
BCSKX vs. FYHTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BCSKX having a 12.64% return and FYHTX slightly lower at 12.59%.
BCSKX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- 12.64%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 28.34%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- —
FYHTX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- 12.59%
- 6M
- 11.07%
- 1Y
- 19.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- —
BCSKX vs. FYHTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCSKX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K | 12.64% | 28.88% | 4.44% | -4.27% | 11.95% | 22.49% | 6.84% | 3.89% | 2.06% |
FYHTX Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund | 12.59% | 14.72% | 4.73% | -8.62% | 15.32% | 26.43% | -3.84% | 6.91% | -14.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCSKX and FYHTX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between BCSKX and FYHTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCSKX vs. FYHTX — Risk / Return Rank
BCSKX
FYHTX
BCSKX vs. FYHTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCSKX | FYHTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.23 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 1.79 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.40 | 6.25 | +6.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCSKX vs. FYHTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCSKX drawdown since its inception was -30.34%, smaller than the maximum FYHTX drawdown of -33.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSKX and FYHTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCSKX | FYHTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.34% | -33.22% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.97% | -9.85% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.51% | -11.52% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.34% | -25.47% | +3.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.97% | -9.85% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -11.91% | +5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 3.25% | -1.02% |
Volatility
BCSKX vs. FYHTX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) at 3.07%. This indicates that BCSKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYHTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCSKX | FYHTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 3.07% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | 11.71% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 14.11% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 15.80% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 14.46% | +0.58% |
BCSKX vs. FYHTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCSKX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FYHTX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCSKX vs. FYHTX - Dividend Comparison
BCSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than FYHTX's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCSKX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K | 2.78% | 3.13% | 3.66% | 9.45% | 9.11% | 2.72% | 0.84% | 2.08% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
FYHTX Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund | 2.60% | 2.93% | 3.78% | 4.10% | 57.34% | 15.05% | 0.00% | 7.00% | 12.49% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCSKX and FYHTX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCSKX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to FYHTX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSKX dropped -30.34% vs FYHTX's -33.22%.
BCSKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCSKX and FYHTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer