PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCSKX vs. GCCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSKX achieves a 19.88% return, which is significantly higher than GCCIX's 18.82% return.


BCSKX

1D
0.98%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
19.88%
6M
22.95%
1Y
39.26%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*

GCCIX

1D
0.82%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
18.82%
6M
19.60%
1Y
29.86%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BCSKX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K
19.88%28.88%4.44%-4.27%11.95%22.49%6.84%3.89%2.06%
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
18.82%15.45%5.92%-9.65%15.70%33.42%-23.01%16.75%-18.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSKX and GCCIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2018

0.72

The correlation between BCSKX and GCCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCSKX vs. GCCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCSKX
BCSKX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BCSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BCSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

GCCIX
GCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCSKXGCCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.91

2.29

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.66

2.91

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.41

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.66

4.17

+2.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.39

11.31

+13.07

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCSKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the GCCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCSKX and GCCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCSKXGCCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

2.29

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.56

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

-0.15

+0.89

Drawdowns

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSKX drawdown since its inception was -30.34%, smaller than the maximum GCCIX drawdown of -90.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSKX and GCCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSKXGCCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.34%

-90.80%

+60.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-7.48%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.51%

-11.89%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.34%

-28.78%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-70.56%

+67.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-69.43%

+62.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.76%

-1.05%

Volatility

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX) is 4.29%, while Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that BCSKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCSKXGCCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

4.95%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

12.20%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.59%

14.40%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

18.48%

-2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

20.02%

-4.98%

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCSKX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCIX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Dividend Comparison

BCSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than GCCIX's 13.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCSKX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K
2.61%3.13%3.66%9.45%9.11%2.72%0.84%2.08%2.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
13.54%16.09%4.08%4.20%10.41%16.46%0.36%10.81%1.47%5.88%0.84%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCSKX and GCCIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCCIX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to BCSKX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSKX dropped -30.34% vs GCCIX's -90.80%.

BCSKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCSKX and GCCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer