PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCSKX vs. GCCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSKX achieves a 12.64% return, which is significantly higher than GCCIX's 11.22% return.


BCSKX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-6.71%
YTD
12.64%
6M
11.14%
1Y
28.34%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*

GCCIX

1D
-0.65%
1M
-6.96%
YTD
11.22%
6M
9.97%
1Y
18.20%
3Y*
10.95%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
4.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BCSKX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K
12.64%28.88%4.44%-4.27%11.95%22.49%6.84%3.89%2.06%
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
11.22%15.45%5.92%-9.65%15.70%33.42%-23.01%16.75%-18.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSKX and GCCIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2018

0.72

The correlation between BCSKX and GCCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCSKX vs. GCCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCSKX
BCSKX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BCSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BCSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GCCIX
GCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCSKXGCCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

1.67

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.40

5.93

+6.47

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCSKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the GCCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCSKX and GCCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSKX drawdown since its inception was -30.34%, smaller than the maximum GCCIX drawdown of -90.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSKX and GCCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSKXGCCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.34%

-90.80%

+60.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-9.96%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.51%

-11.89%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.34%

-28.78%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.97%

-72.44%

+63.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-69.42%

+62.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

3.25%

-1.02%

Volatility

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) at 3.31%. This indicates that BCSKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCSKXGCCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

3.31%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

12.28%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

14.43%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.75%

18.46%

-2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

19.98%

-4.94%

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCSKX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCIX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCSKX vs. GCCIX - Dividend Comparison

BCSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than GCCIX's 14.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCSKX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K
2.78%3.13%3.66%9.45%9.11%2.72%0.84%2.08%2.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
14.46%16.09%4.08%4.20%10.41%16.46%0.36%10.81%1.47%5.88%0.84%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCSKX and GCCIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCSKX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to GCCIX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSKX dropped -30.34% vs GCCIX's -90.80%.

BCSKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCSKX and GCCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer