PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCS vs. VTIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCS vs. VTIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays PLC (BCS) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCS achieves a -1.82% return, which is significantly lower than VTIP's 2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BCS has outperformed VTIP with an annualized return of 12.30%, while VTIP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.14% annualized return.


BCS

1D
-2.33%
1M
8.05%
YTD
-1.82%
6M
7.42%
1Y
40.02%
3Y*
51.43%
5Y*
22.63%
10Y*
12.30%

VTIP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.04%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCS vs. VTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCS
Barclays PLC
-1.82%96.49%76.26%6.01%-21.90%31.71%-12.84%31.90%-29.25%0.44%
VTIP
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
2.05%6.07%4.74%4.62%-2.94%5.36%4.95%4.86%0.56%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BCS and VTIP is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2012

0.01

The correlation between BCS and VTIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.04 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCS vs. VTIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCS
BCS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VTIP
VTIP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCS vs. VTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays PLC (BCS) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCSVTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.67

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

6.75

-5.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

26.06

-21.65

BCS vs. VTIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the VTIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCS and VTIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCSVTIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

3.15

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.22

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

1.15

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.89

-0.72

Drawdowns

BCS vs. VTIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCS drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than VTIP's maximum drawdown of -6.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCS and VTIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSVTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.36%

-6.27%

-88.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.20%

-0.70%

-25.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.20%

-0.98%

-25.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.14%

-5.50%

-42.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.10%

-6.27%

-59.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.99%

-0.02%

-26.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.43%

-1.04%

-37.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.10%

0.18%

+8.92%

Volatility

BCS vs. VTIP - Volatility Comparison

Barclays PLC (BCS) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) at 0.43%. This indicates that BCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCSVTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

0.43%

+10.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.30%

1.02%

+22.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.85%

1.50%

+27.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.97%

2.77%

+31.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.72%

2.74%

+34.98%

Dividends

BCS vs. VTIP - Dividend Comparison

BCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than VTIP's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCS
Barclays PLC
1.89%1.70%3.13%4.86%4.18%1.61%3.91%3.68%3.21%1.37%2.26%2.95%
VTIP
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
3.58%3.81%2.70%2.86%6.84%4.68%1.20%1.95%2.45%1.52%0.76%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCS and VTIP have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCS has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to VTIP (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCS dropped -94.36% vs VTIP's -6.27%.

VTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCS and VTIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer