PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCS vs. MKOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCS vs. MKOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays PLC (BCS) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCS achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly lower than MKOR's 83.03% return.


BCS

1D
-0.99%
1M
13.39%
YTD
7.44%
6M
7.31%
1Y
56.63%
3Y*
59.15%
5Y*
26.62%
10Y*
15.23%

MKOR

1D
-10.28%
1M
2.07%
YTD
83.03%
6M
91.08%
1Y
138.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCS vs. MKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BCS
Barclays PLC
7.44%96.49%76.26%-1.62%
MKOR
Matthews Korea Active ETF
83.03%70.33%-15.76%-2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BCS and MKOR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2023

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCS vs. MKOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCS
BCS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MKOR
MKOR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCS vs. MKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays PLC (BCS) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCSMKORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.51

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

6.77

-4.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.14

24.67

-18.52

BCS vs. MKOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the MKOR Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCS and MKOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCS vs. MKOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCS drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than MKOR's maximum drawdown of -22.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCS and MKOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSMKORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.36%

-22.09%

-72.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.20%

-20.62%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.10%

-11.21%

-8.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.41%

-6.28%

-32.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.25%

5.65%

+3.60%

Volatility

BCS vs. MKOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Barclays PLC (BCS) is 9.43%, while Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) has a volatility of 23.06%. This indicates that BCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCSMKORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.43%

23.06%

-13.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.19%

38.98%

-14.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.44%

41.93%

-12.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.06%

29.28%

+4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.03%

29.28%

+7.75%

Dividends

BCS vs. MKOR - Dividend Comparison

BCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than MKOR's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCS
Barclays PLC
1.73%1.70%3.13%4.86%4.18%1.61%3.91%3.68%3.21%1.37%2.26%2.95%
MKOR
Matthews Korea Active ETF
1.43%2.62%5.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCS and MKOR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MKOR has higher volatility (23.06%) compared to BCS (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCS dropped -94.36% vs MKOR's -22.09%.

MKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCS and MKOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer