BCPL vs. TOTL
BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) and TOTL (State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCPL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TOTL.
Performance
BCPL vs. TOTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCPL
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOTL
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- -0.38%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 4.39%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.64%
BCPL vs. TOTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 0.55% |
TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF | -0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCPL and TOTL is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCPL vs. TOTL — Risk / Return Rank
BCPL
TOTL
BCPL vs. TOTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF (TOTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCPL | TOTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.38 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
BCPL vs. TOTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCPL drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum TOTL drawdown of -16.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPL and TOTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCPL | TOTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -16.48% | +13.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -1.99% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -3.13% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.98% | — |
Volatility
BCPL vs. TOTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCPL | TOTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 3.44% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.04% | 5.59% | -1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.04% | 4.78% | -0.74% |
BCPL vs. TOTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCPL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TOTL's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCPL vs. TOTL - Dividend Comparison
BCPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than TOTL's 5.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF | 5.29% | 5.23% | 5.35% | 4.85% | 4.68% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 3.31% | 3.41% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 2.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCPL and TOTL have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCPL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCPL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TOTL.
TOTL has the higher dividend yield at 5.29%, compared with 1.57% for BCPL.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BCPL and 0.55% for TOTL.
Find the right allocation for BCPL and TOTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer