BCPC vs. FICO
BCPC (Balchem Corporation) and FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) are both stocks. BCPC operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while FICO operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BCPC returned 10.62%/yr vs 26.58%/yr for FICO. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BCPC vs. FICO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCPC achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly higher than FICO's -20.96% return. Over the past 10 years, BCPC has underperformed FICO with an annualized return of 10.62%, while FICO has yielded a comparatively higher 26.58% annualized return.
BCPC
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 10.73%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 10.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.13%
FICO
- 1D
- 4.35%
- 1M
- 12.97%
- 6M
- -13.51%
- YTD
- -20.96%
- 1Y
- -11.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- 20.42%
- 10Y*
- 26.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.39M | $37.77M | $36.14M | |
| $288.78M | $298.42M | $364.47M |
BCPC vs. FICO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPC Balchem Corporation | 8.11% | -5.33% | 10.15% | 22.80% | -27.15% | 46.90% | 13.96% | 30.38% | -2.19% | -3.46% |
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | -20.96% | -15.08% | 71.04% | 94.46% | 38.03% | -15.14% | 36.39% | 100.36% | 22.06% | 28.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCPC and FICO is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 1992 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BCPC and FICO has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
BCPC:
$5.33B
FICO:
$30.99B
BCPC:
$4.87
FICO:
$31.71
BCPC:
34.02
FICO:
42.14
BCPC:
2.64
FICO:
2.24
BCPC:
5.09
FICO:
14.19
BCPC:
$1.06B
FICO:
$2.26B
BCPC:
$383.55M
FICO:
$1.90B
BCPC:
$259.05M
FICO:
$1.16B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCPC vs. FICO — Risk / Return Rank
BCPC
FICO
BCPC vs. FICO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Balchem Corporation (BCPC) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCPC | FICO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.00 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | -0.23 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | -0.44 | +1.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCPC vs. FICO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCPC drawdown since its inception was -85.26%, which is greater than FICO's maximum drawdown of -79.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPC and FICO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCPC | FICO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.26% | -79.26% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.03% | -50.93% | +35.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.10% | -61.28% | +38.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -61.28% | +27.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.72% | -61.28% | +24.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.53% | -43.91% | +34.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.42% | -18.14% | -4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.71% | 26.89% | -19.18% |
Volatility
BCPC vs. FICO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Balchem Corporation (BCPC) is 4.76%, while Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a volatility of 11.71%. This indicates that BCPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCPC | FICO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 11.71% | -6.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.48% | 40.17% | -25.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.99% | 50.67% | -29.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.14% | 41.12% | -16.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 38.15% | -11.44% |
Dividends
BCPC vs. FICO - Dividend Comparison
BCPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPC Balchem Corporation | 0.58% | 0.63% | 0.53% | 0.80% | 0.58% | 0.38% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.45% | 0.56% |
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.08% |
Financials
BCPC vs. FICO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Balchem Corporation and Fair Isaac Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCPC vs. FICO - Profitability Comparison
BCPC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a gross profit of 101.08M and revenue of 270.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.
FICO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 600.48M and revenue of 691.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
BCPC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Balchem Corporation reported an operating income of 55.63M and revenue of 270.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.
FICO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 402.47M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 58.2%.
BCPC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a net income of 40.29M and revenue of 270.71M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
FICO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 264.46M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in a net margin of 38.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCPC and FICO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FICO has higher volatility (11.71%) compared to BCPC (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCPC dropped -85.26% vs FICO's -79.26%.
BCPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCPC and FICO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer