PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCOR vs. BLCN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCOR vs. BLCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCOR achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly lower than BLCN's 13.09% return.


BCOR

1D
-2.77%
1M
-5.42%
YTD
-2.23%
6M
-9.89%
1Y
-17.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLCN

1D
0.39%
1M
10.42%
YTD
13.09%
6M
10.14%
1Y
27.10%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
-9.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCOR vs. BLCN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCOR and BLCN is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

0.50

The correlation between BCOR and BLCN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

BCOR vs. BLCN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BCOR
BLCN

Technology

34.3%
57.1%

Consumer Cyclical

32.9%
4.4%

Financial Services

22.8%
7.3%

Communication Services

8.3%
3.5%

Industrials

0.9%
16.0%

Energy

0.5%

-

Utilities

0.2%
4.2%

Healthcare

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

4.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

BCOR
34.3%
BLCN
57.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BCOR
32.9%
BLCN
4.4%

Financial Services

BCOR
22.8%
BLCN
7.3%

Communication Services

BCOR
8.3%
BLCN
3.5%

Industrials

BCOR
0.9%
BLCN
16.0%

Energy

BCOR
0.5%
BLCN

-

Utilities

BCOR
0.2%
BLCN
4.2%

Healthcare

BCOR
0.2%
BLCN

-

Basic Materials

BCOR

-

BLCN
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

BCOR

-

BLCN

-

Real Estate

BCOR

-

BLCN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCOR vs. BLCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCOR
BCOR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BLCN
BLCN Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BLCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCN Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCN Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCOR vs. BLCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCORBLCNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.42

0.76

-1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.37

1.25

-1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.15

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

0.92

-1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.75

1.97

-2.72

BCOR vs. BLCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the BLCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCOR and BLCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCORBLCNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

0.76

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.08

-0.04

Drawdowns

BCOR vs. BLCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCOR drawdown since its inception was -42.99%, smaller than the maximum BLCN drawdown of -67.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOR and BLCN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCORBLCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.99%

-67.51%

+24.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.99%

-29.53%

-13.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.84%

-45.11%

+14.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-30.29%

+12.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.12%

13.82%

+9.30%

Volatility

BCOR vs. BLCN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) is 10.49%, while Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) has a volatility of 14.45%. This indicates that BCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCORBLCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

14.45%

-3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.45%

29.11%

+2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.24%

36.03%

+5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.93%

34.93%

+8.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.93%

31.22%

+11.71%

BCOR vs. BLCN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCOR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCN's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCOR vs. BLCN - Dividend Comparison

BCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than BLCN's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BCOR
Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF
3.17%3.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BLCN
Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF
2.66%3.01%0.67%0.54%1.28%0.56%0.58%1.45%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCOR and BLCN have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLCN has higher volatility (14.45%) compared to BCOR (10.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCOR dropped -42.99% vs BLCN's -67.51%.

On 1-year performance, BLCN leads with 27.10% vs -17.33% for BCOR. On fees, BCOR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BCOR has been the lower-risk option at 10.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BLCN has performed better with a 27.10% return vs -17.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BCOR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BLCN.

BCOR has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 2.66% for BLCN.

BCOR is categorized as Blockchain, while BLCN is Large Cap Blend Equities. BCOR tracks Indxx Bitcoin Adopters Index, while BLCN tracks Siren NASDAQ Blockchain Economy Index. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BCOR and 0.68% for BLCN.

BLCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCOR and BLCN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer