BCIL vs. BCGS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BCIL (Bancreek International Large Cap ETF) and BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCIL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Bancreek, while BCGS is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Bancreek. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.80% expense ratio.

Performance

BCIL vs. BCGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL) and Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCIL

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 7.38%
• 6M: 6.23%
• 1Y: -0.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCGS

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCIL vs. BCGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCIL Bancreek International Large Cap ETF	11.05%
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	8.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BCIL and BCGS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026	0.90

Return for Risk

BCIL vs. BCGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCIL

BCIL Risk / Return Rank: 9
BCIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BCIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
BCIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9
BCIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BCIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9

BCGS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCIL vs. BCGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL) and Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCIL	BCGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.13	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.00	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.00	—	—

Drawdowns

BCIL vs. BCGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCIL drawdown since its inception was -16.18%, which is greater than BCGS's maximum drawdown of -7.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCIL and BCGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCIL	BCGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.18%	-7.43%	-8.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.60%	-2.62%	-0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.28%	-2.12%	-2.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCIL	BCGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.92%	22.51%	-4.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.81%	22.51%	-5.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.81%	22.51%	-5.70%

BCIL vs. BCGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BCIL and BCGS have an expense ratio of 0.80%.

Dividends

BCIL vs. BCGS - Dividend Comparison

BCIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than BCGS's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%
BCIL Bancreek International Large Cap ETF	0.99%	1.25%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCIL and BCGS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, BCIL and BCGS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BCIL or BCGS?

Both ETFs have the same 0.80% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCIL or BCGS?

BCIL and BCGS have the same expense ratio: 0.80% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCIL or BCGS?

BCIL has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.02% for BCGS.

What is the main difference between BCIL and BCGS?

BCIL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BCGS is Global Equities.