PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCI vs. DBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCI vs. DBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCI achieves a 26.68% return, which is significantly higher than DBB's 14.25% return.


BCI

1D
-0.12%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
26.68%
6M
25.55%
1Y
38.68%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*

DBB

1D
-1.58%
1M
7.02%
YTD
14.25%
6M
21.06%
1Y
43.74%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCI vs. DBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
26.68%15.07%5.47%-8.79%15.09%26.18%-2.77%7.06%-11.21%2.94%
DBB
Invesco DB Base Metals Fund
14.25%25.01%7.90%1.15%-11.80%28.97%15.53%-1.17%-19.47%18.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BCI and DBB is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2017

0.51

The correlation between BCI and DBB shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BCI vs. DBB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BCI
DBB

Financial Services

100.0%
98.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BCI
100.0%
DBB
98.8%

Basic Materials

BCI

-

DBB

-

Communication Services

BCI

-

DBB

-

Consumer Cyclical

BCI

-

DBB

-

Consumer Defensive

BCI

-

DBB

-

Energy

BCI

-

DBB

-

Healthcare

BCI

-

DBB

-

Industrials

BCI

-

DBB

-

Real Estate

BCI

-

DBB

-

Technology

BCI

-

DBB

-

Utilities

BCI

-

DBB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCI vs. DBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCI
BCI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DBB
DBB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCI vs. DBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCIDBBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

2.44

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.92

3.19

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.10

4.00

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.14

15.29

-2.15

BCI vs. DBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the DBB Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCI and DBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCIDBBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.44

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.41

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.08

+0.40

Drawdowns

BCI vs. DBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCI drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, smaller than the maximum DBB drawdown of -60.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCI and DBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCIDBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.69%

-60.20%

+27.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-11.00%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.38%

-16.59%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.50%

-35.00%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.52%

-1.58%

-2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.00%

-30.89%

+18.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.87%

+0.08%

Volatility

BCI vs. DBB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) is 5.16%, while Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that BCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCIDBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

5.85%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.80%

15.73%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.92%

17.99%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.82%

20.25%

-3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

18.47%

-2.82%

BCI vs. DBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBB's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCI vs. DBB - Dividend Comparison

BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%, more than DBB's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
13.01%16.49%3.29%3.93%19.98%19.43%0.68%1.47%1.13%5.02%
DBB
Invesco DB Base Metals Fund
2.29%2.61%4.75%7.21%0.94%0.00%0.00%1.83%1.59%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCI and DBB have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBB has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to BCI (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCI dropped -32.69% vs DBB's -60.20%.

On 5-year performance, BCI leads with 11.07% vs 8.22% for DBB. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BCI has been the lower-risk option at 5.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BCI has performed better with a 11.07% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DBB.

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 2.29% for DBB.

BCI is categorized as Commodities, while DBB is Metals. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BCI and 0.80% for DBB.

DBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCI and DBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer