BCI vs. CERY
BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) and CERY (SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds - BCI tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return while CERY tracks the Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BCI returned 23.04% vs 27.40% for CERY. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCI charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CERY.
Performance
BCI vs. CERY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCI achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly lower than CERY's 18.11% return.
BCI
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -9.78%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- 1Y
- 23.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- —
CERY
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -9.49%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 27.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCI vs. CERY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 15.26% | 15.07% | 6.13% |
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 18.11% | 15.68% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCI and CERY is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.92 |
The correlation between BCI and CERY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCI vs. CERY — Risk / Return Rank
BCI
CERY
BCI vs. CERY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCI | CERY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.31 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 2.21 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.95 | 10.02 | -3.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCI vs. CERY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCI drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, which is greater than CERY's maximum drawdown of -12.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCI and CERY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCI | CERY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.69% | -12.44% | -20.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | -12.44% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.12% | -12.44% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.99% | -2.29% | -9.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.76% | +0.58% |
Volatility
BCI vs. CERY - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) have volatilities of 3.55% and 3.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCI | CERY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 3.64% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 13.63% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.20% | 15.66% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 14.74% | +2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 14.74% | +0.91% |
BCI vs. CERY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than CERY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCI vs. CERY - Dividend Comparison
BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.30%, more than CERY's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.30% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.23% | 4.99% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, BCI and CERY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CERY has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to BCI (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCI dropped -32.69% vs CERY's -12.44%.
On 1-year performance, CERY leads with 27.40% vs 23.04% for BCI. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CERY has performed better with a 27.40% return vs 23.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BCI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CERY.
BCI has the higher dividend yield at 14.30%, compared with 4.23% for CERY.
BCI tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while CERY tracks Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for BCI and 0.28% for CERY.
CERY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCI and CERY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer