BCI vs. BCIM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM).

BCI and BCIM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCI is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017. BCIM is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Industrial Metals. It was launched on Sep 22, 2021.

Performance

BCI vs. BCIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BCI vs. BCIM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	24.37%	15.07%	5.47%	-8.79%	15.09%	0.81%
BCIM abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF	0.00%	10.71%	3.30%	-9.68%	-3.29%	4.17%

Returns By Period

BCI

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 11.37%
• YTD: 24.37%
• 6M: 31.23%
• 1Y: 31.71%
• 3Y*: 13.50%
• 5Y*: 13.31%
• 10Y*: —

BCIM

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCI vs. BCIM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BCIM's 0.41% expense ratio.

BCIM

abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF

BCI

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF

Return for Risk

BCI vs. BCIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 89
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCI vs. BCIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCI	BCIM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.71	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCI	BCIM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between BCI and BCIM is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BCI vs. BCIM - Dividend Comparison

BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.26%, more than BCIM's 3.77% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.26%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
BCIM abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF	3.77%	3.77%	11.47%	3.36%	0.72%	1.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BCI	BCIM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.19%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCI	BCIM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.09%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.63%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.57%	—	—