PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCHS.L vs. GXLK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCHS.L vs. GXLK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BCHS.L is traded in GBp, while GXLK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GXLK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHS.L achieves a 26.66% return, which is significantly higher than GXLK.L's 23.38% return.


BCHS.L

1D
-1.63%
1M
10.46%
YTD
26.66%
6M
16.86%
1Y
61.41%
3Y*
42.48%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*

GXLK.L

1D
-2.05%
1M
14.24%
YTD
23.38%
6M
22.20%
1Y
53.75%
3Y*
26.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCHS.L vs. GXLK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BCHS.L
Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc
26.66%35.24%18.50%58.28%-42.99%
GXLK.L
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
23.38%15.88%24.73%48.31%-16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BCHS.L and GXLK.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.58

The correlation between BCHS.L and GXLK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCHS.L vs. GXLK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHS.L
BCHS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BCHS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

GXLK.L
GXLK.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHS.L vs. GXLK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCHS.LGXLK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.46

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.21

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

8.20

-4.00

BCHS.L vs. GXLK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHS.L and GXLK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCHS.LGXLK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.77

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.79

-0.08

Drawdowns

BCHS.L vs. GXLK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHS.L drawdown since its inception was -55.89%, which is greater than GXLK.L's maximum drawdown of -28.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHS.L and GXLK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCHS.LGXLK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.89%

-28.24%

-27.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.49%

-16.67%

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.64%

-28.24%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-2.76%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.40%

-7.64%

-13.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.57%

6.54%

+8.03%

Volatility

BCHS.L vs. GXLK.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) has a higher volatility of 10.49% compared to SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) at 6.90%. This indicates that BCHS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXLK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCHS.LGXLK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

6.90%

+3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.68%

14.09%

+10.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.46%

19.32%

+18.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.61%

26.83%

+8.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.37%

26.83%

+7.54%

BCHS.L vs. GXLK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHS.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLK.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCHS.L vs. GXLK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCHS.L nor GXLK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BCHS.L and GXLK.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXLK.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLK.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BCHS.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BCHS.L and 0.15% for GXLK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCHS.L and GXLK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer