BCHP vs. IOO
BCHP (Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF) and IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCHP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while IOO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net). BCHP is actively managed, while IOO is passively managed. Over the past year, BCHP returned -0.43% vs 29.33% for IOO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCHP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IOO.
Performance
BCHP vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCHP achieves a -4.78% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 7.16% return.
BCHP
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -4.78%
- 6M
- -5.76%
- 1Y
- -0.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IOO
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -4.12%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- 1Y
- 29.33%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- 15.33%
- 10Y*
- 16.60%
BCHP vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF | -4.78% | 10.20% | 20.55% | 13.14% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 7.16% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCHP and IOO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between BCHP and IOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
BCHP vs. IOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BCHP
IOO
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
BCHP
IOO
Financial Services
BCHP
IOO
Consumer Cyclical
BCHP
IOO
Communication Services
BCHP
IOO
Industrials
BCHP
IOO
Healthcare
BCHP
IOO
Real Estate
BCHP
IOO
Basic Materials
BCHP
-
IOO
Consumer Defensive
BCHP
-
IOO
Energy
BCHP
-
IOO
Utilities
BCHP
-
IOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCHP vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank
BCHP
IOO
BCHP vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCHP | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.37 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 2.97 | -2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 12.57 | -12.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCHP vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCHP drawdown since its inception was -18.56%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHP and IOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCHP | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.56% | -55.85% | +37.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.12% | -9.94% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.49% | -5.81% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.02% | -11.25% | +8.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.78% | 2.34% | +3.44% |
Volatility
BCHP vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 5.30%. This indicates that BCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCHP | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 5.30% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 11.46% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.56% | 14.25% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 17.17% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 17.73% | -0.74% |
BCHP vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCHP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCHP vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
BCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.02% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.86% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCHP and IOO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCHP has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to IOO (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCHP dropped -18.56% vs IOO's -55.85%.
On 1-year performance, IOO leads with 29.33% vs -0.43% for BCHP. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IOO has performed better with a 29.33% return vs -0.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BCHP.
IOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for BCHP.
BCHP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IOO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Principal and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BCHP and 0.40% for IOO.
IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCHP and IOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer