BCHP vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BCHP (Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCHP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCHP returned 2.55% vs 2.91% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. BCHP charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

BCHP vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHP achieves a -4.08% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.18% return.

BCHP

• 1D: -2.07%
• 1M: -3.85%
• YTD: -4.08%
• 6M: -4.11%
• 1Y: 2.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 2.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCHP vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF	-4.08%	10.20%	20.55%	17.20%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BCHP and BAMU is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	-0.02

The correlation between BCHP and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BCHP vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHP

BCHP Risk / Return Rank: 10
BCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
BCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 10

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHP vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCHP	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	5.01	-4.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	8.84	-8.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	2.43	-1.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	24.72	-24.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.45	97.90	-97.45

BCHP vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHP Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHP and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCHP vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHP drawdown since its inception was -18.56%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHP and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCHP	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.56%	-0.36%	-18.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.12%	-0.12%	-18.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.82%	0.00%	-6.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.00%	-0.02%	-2.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.74%	0.03%	+5.71%

Volatility

BCHP vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that BCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCHP	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.09%	0.09%	+6.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.76%	0.40%	+13.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.59%	0.58%	+16.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.00%	0.87%	+16.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.00%	0.87%	+16.13%

BCHP vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCHP vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

BCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.02%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCHP and BAMU in my portfolio?

BCHP and BAMU have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCHP or BAMU?

BCHP has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCHP dropped -18.56% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, BCHP or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.91% vs 2.55% for BCHP. On fees, BCHP is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCHP or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.91% return vs 2.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCHP or BAMU?

BCHP is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCHP or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for BCHP.

What is the main difference between BCHP and BAMU?

BCHP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BCHP and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.