PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCHN.L vs. KROG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCHN.L vs. KROG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BCHN.L is traded in USD, while KROG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the KROG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHN.L achieves a 25.82% return, which is significantly higher than KROG.L's 15.27% return.


BCHN.L

1D
-2.12%
1M
10.57%
YTD
25.82%
6M
16.47%
1Y
61.23%
3Y*
45.96%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*

KROG.L

1D
0.47%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
15.27%
6M
14.32%
1Y
11.50%
3Y*
0.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCHN.L vs. KROG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BCHN.L
Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF
25.82%45.50%17.30%66.38%-44.96%
KROG.L
Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
15.27%7.94%-8.44%-23.03%-23.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BCHN.L and KROG.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between BCHN.L and KROG.L has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCHN.L vs. KROG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHN.L
BCHN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BCHN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

KROG.L
KROG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
KROG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KROG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHN.L vs. KROG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCHN.LKROG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.13

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.06

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.05

2.34

+1.71

BCHN.L vs. KROG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the KROG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHN.L and KROG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCHN.LKROG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

0.71

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

-0.42

+1.08

Drawdowns

BCHN.L vs. KROG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHN.L drawdown since its inception was -61.69%, which is greater than KROG.L's maximum drawdown of -53.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHN.L and KROG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCHN.LKROG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.69%

-53.14%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.54%

-10.76%

-20.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.39%

-29.25%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.60%

-37.48%

+32.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.68%

-37.00%

+13.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.09%

4.91%

+10.18%

Volatility

BCHN.L vs. KROG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L) has a higher volatility of 11.58% compared to Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) at 6.11%. This indicates that BCHN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCHN.LKROG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.58%

6.11%

+5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.89%

12.61%

+14.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.59%

16.06%

+24.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.82%

21.20%

+17.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.68%

21.20%

+15.48%

BCHN.L vs. KROG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHN.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than KROG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCHN.L vs. KROG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCHN.L nor KROG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BCHN.L and KROG.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KROG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KROG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BCHN.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BCHN.L and 0.50% for KROG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCHN.L and KROG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer