BCHN.L vs. BKCG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L) and Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L).
BCHN.L and BKCG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCHN.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Mar 8, 2019. BKCG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Jan 21, 2022. Both BCHN.L and BKCG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BCHN.L or BKCG.L.
Key characteristics
BCHN.L | BKCG.L | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | -3.87% | -23.22% |
1Y Return | 46.00% | 87.73% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.20 | 1.03 |
Daily Std Dev | 36.34% | 79.22% |
Max Drawdown | -61.69% | -82.56% |
Current Drawdown | -37.33% | -43.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCHN.L and BKCG.L is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BCHN.L vs. BKCG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BCHN.L achieves a -3.87% return, which is significantly higher than BKCG.L's -23.22% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCHN.L vs. BKCG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCHN.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BKCG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BCHN.L vs. BKCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L) and Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BCHN.L vs. BKCG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCHN.L nor BKCG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BCHN.L vs. BKCG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCHN.L drawdown since its inception was -61.69%, smaller than the maximum BKCG.L drawdown of -82.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHN.L and BKCG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BCHN.L vs. BKCG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L) is 12.73%, while Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L) has a volatility of 22.77%. This indicates that BCHN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKCG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.