BCGS vs. FWD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCGS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.

Performance

BCGS vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCGS

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 2.63%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FWD

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 14.15%
• YTD: 40.11%
• 6M: 39.78%
• 1Y: 75.95%
• 3Y*: 39.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGS vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	6.44%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	29.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BCGS and FWD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026	0.89

Return for Risk

BCGS vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 87
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCGS vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCGS	FWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.39	1.67	-0.28

Drawdowns

BCGS vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and FWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCGS	FWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-29.02%	+21.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-0.27%	-1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-4.06%	+1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCGS	FWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.77%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.77%	24.15%	-2.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.77%	24.72%	-2.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.77%	24.72%	-2.95%

BCGS vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCGS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCGS vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than FWD's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.08%	0.11%	1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCGS and FWD in my portfolio?

BCGS and FWD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCGS or FWD?

On fees, FWD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCGS or FWD?

FWD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCGS or FWD?

FWD has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.02% for BCGS.

What is the main difference between BCGS and FWD?

They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCGS and 0.65% for FWD.