BCGDX vs. VMVFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX).
BCGDX is managed by Blue Current Funds. It was launched on Sep 17, 2014. VMVFX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Performance
BCGDX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCGDX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCGDX Blue Current Global Dividend Fund | -2.23% | 30.23% | 16.71% | 14.46% | -8.62% | 18.78% | 7.06% | 26.17% | -12.14% | 18.97% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 1.71% | 12.74% | 13.38% | 7.82% | -4.48% | 23.74% | -3.99% | 23.28% | -1.79% | 15.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCGDX achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly lower than VMVFX's 1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, BCGDX has outperformed VMVFX with an annualized return of 10.67%, while VMVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.02% annualized return.
BCGDX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -8.39%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- 20.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
VMVFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 8.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCGDX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCGDX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BCGDX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank
BCGDX
VMVFX
BCGDX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCGDX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 0.90 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 1.30 | +0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.20 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 1.06 | +0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 5.20 | +3.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCGDX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 0.90 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.93 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.72 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.78 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCGDX and VMVFX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BCGDX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison
BCGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than VMVFX's 9.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCGDX Blue Current Global Dividend Fund | 4.58% | 4.77% | 4.23% | 1.84% | 5.11% | 8.48% | 1.45% | 2.24% | 1.53% | 3.44% | 1.99% | 1.68% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 9.81% | 9.98% | 3.77% | 3.05% | 4.96% | 12.73% | 2.02% | 5.12% | 7.27% | 2.30% | 2.71% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
BCGDX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCGDX drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, which is greater than VMVFX's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGDX and VMVFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCGDX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -33.09% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.96% | -7.96% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -13.02% | -7.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.90% | -33.09% | -2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.70% | -6.03% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -2.84% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 1.63% | +0.63% |
Volatility
BCGDX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison
Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 2.61%. This indicates that BCGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCGDX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 2.61% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 4.87% | +3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 10.02% | +3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.15% | 10.75% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 12.48% | +3.38% |