PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCGDX vs. PRAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCGDX vs. PRAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) and T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCGDX achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than PRAFX's 9.84% return. Over the past 10 years, BCGDX has outperformed PRAFX with an annualized return of 11.98%, while PRAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.59% annualized return.


BCGDX

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.11%
YTD
8.67%
6M
7.45%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
11.98%

PRAFX

1D
-1.42%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
9.84%
6M
8.67%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGDX vs. PRAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCGDX
Blue Current Global Dividend Fund
8.67%30.23%16.71%14.46%-8.62%18.78%7.06%26.17%-12.14%18.97%
PRAFX
T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund
9.84%29.51%0.32%6.65%-10.24%25.74%7.02%19.62%-11.55%10.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BCGDX and PRAFX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.79

The correlation between BCGDX and PRAFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCGDX vs. PRAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCGDX
BCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAFX
PRAFX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PRAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCGDX vs. PRAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) and T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCGDXPRAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

2.38

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

8.04

+3.61

BCGDX vs. PRAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCGDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the PRAFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCGDX and PRAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCGDX vs. PRAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGDX drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum PRAFX drawdown of -38.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGDX and PRAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCGDXPRAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.90%

-38.05%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-12.91%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.79%

-16.86%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.01%

-26.73%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-38.05%

+2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-8.18%

+7.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-8.76%

+4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

3.80%

-1.66%

Volatility

BCGDX vs. PRAFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blue Current Global Dividend Fund (BCGDX) is 3.20%, while T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund (PRAFX) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that BCGDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCGDXPRAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

5.62%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

14.00%

-4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.13%

16.89%

-5.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.28%

17.77%

-4.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.84%

18.14%

-2.30%

BCGDX vs. PRAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCGDX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAFX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCGDX vs. PRAFX - Dividend Comparison

BCGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than PRAFX's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCGDX
Blue Current Global Dividend Fund
4.36%4.77%4.23%1.84%5.11%8.48%1.45%2.24%1.53%3.44%1.99%1.68%
PRAFX
T. Rowe Price Real Assets Fund
2.68%2.94%1.56%1.52%1.38%1.83%1.37%2.64%2.58%1.45%1.96%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCGDX and PRAFX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRAFX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to BCGDX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCGDX dropped -35.90% vs PRAFX's -38.05%.

BCGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCGDX and PRAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer