BCFU.DE vs. XSVT.DE
BCFU.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and XSVT.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C) are both Commodities funds - BCFU.DE tracks the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity while XSVT.DE tracks the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BCFU.DE returned 14.58%/yr vs 19.54%/yr for XSVT.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCFU.DE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XSVT.DE.
Performance
BCFU.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BCFU.DE is traded in USD, while XSVT.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XSVT.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFU.DE achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly lower than XSVT.DE's 20.23% return.
BCFU.DE
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 6M
- 20.17%
- 1Y
- 32.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- —
XSVT.DE
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 20.23%
- 6M
- 26.26%
- 1Y
- 45.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCFU.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 17.70% | 19.44% | 4.91% | -5.62% | 5.99% |
XSVT.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C | 20.23% | 29.11% | 8.52% | -9.91% | 7.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFU.DE and XSVT.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between BCFU.DE and XSVT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFU.DE vs. XSVT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFU.DE
XSVT.DE
BCFU.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCFU.DE | XSVT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.21 | 4.86 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.49 | 13.12 | +0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFU.DE | XSVT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.49 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.62 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
BCFU.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFU.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.81%, which is greater than XSVT.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFU.DE and XSVT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFU.DE | XSVT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.81% | -27.05% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -9.32% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.73% | -13.65% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -2.66% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.95% | -13.66% | +1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 3.46% | -1.05% |
Volatility
BCFU.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) have volatilities of 4.57% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFU.DE | XSVT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 4.53% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 15.68% | -3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.96% | 18.23% | -4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 19.52% | -3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 19.52% | -4.97% |
BCFU.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFU.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVT.DE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCFU.DE vs. XSVT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCFU.DE nor XSVT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFU.DE and XSVT.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSVT.DE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSVT.DE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BCFU.DE.
BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while XSVT.DE tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BCFU.DE and 0.29% for XSVT.DE.
Find the right allocation for BCFU.DE and XSVT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer