AW1C.DE vs. CHSJ.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) and UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc (CHSJ.DE).

AW1C.DE and CHSJ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AW1C.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® ESG Elite. It was launched on Feb 18, 2021. CHSJ.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan European Collateralised Loan Obligation Index AAA sub-set (€-CLOIE AAA). It was launched on Jul 1, 2025. Both AW1C.DE and CHSJ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AW1C.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) and UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc (CHSJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AW1C.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	-3.47%	13.27%
CHSJ.DE UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc	0.36%	1.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AW1C.DE achieves a -3.47% return, which is significantly lower than CHSJ.DE's 0.36% return.

AW1C.DE

• 1D: 2.29%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: -3.47%
• 6M: 3.00%
• 1Y: 9.87%
• 3Y*: 14.95%
• 5Y*: 11.56%
• 10Y*: —

CHSJ.DE

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 1.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AW1C.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AW1C.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CHSJ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

CHSJ.DE

UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc

AW1C.DE

UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc

Return for Risk

AW1C.DE vs. CHSJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AW1C.DE

AW1C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 23
AW1C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
AW1C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
AW1C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 29
AW1C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
AW1C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AW1C.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) and UBS EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF EUR Acc (CHSJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AW1C.DE	CHSJ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.20	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AW1C.DE	CHSJ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	2.24	-1.57

Correlation

The correlation between AW1C.DE and CHSJ.DE is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AW1C.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AW1C.DE nor CHSJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AW1C.DE vs. CHSJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AW1C.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.40%, which is greater than CHSJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -0.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1C.DE and CHSJ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AW1C.DE	CHSJ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.40%	-0.38%	-22.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.96%	-0.31%	-14.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-0.07%	-5.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AW1C.DE	CHSJ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.78%	1.31%	+26.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.28%	1.31%	+16.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.21%	1.31%	+16.90%