PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCFS.DE vs. AW10.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCFS.DE vs. AW10.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc (BCFS.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW10.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCFS.DE achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly lower than AW10.DE's 7.93% return.


BCFS.DE

1D
0.42%
1M
1.32%
YTD
4.49%
6M
5.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AW10.DE

1D
0.29%
1M
3.41%
YTD
7.93%
6M
9.80%
1Y
16.96%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCFS.DE vs. AW10.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCFS.DE and AW10.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025

0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCFS.DE vs. AW10.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCFS.DE

AW10.DE
AW10.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
AW10.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AW10.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
AW10.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
AW10.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
AW10.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCFS.DE vs. AW10.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc (BCFS.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW10.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCFS.DE vs. AW10.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCFS.DEAW10.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.09

0.71

+2.37

Drawdowns

BCFS.DE vs. AW10.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCFS.DE drawdown since its inception was -2.21%, smaller than the maximum AW10.DE drawdown of -19.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFS.DE and AW10.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCFS.DEAW10.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-19.92%

+17.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.44%

+5.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-5.91%

+5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.55%

Volatility

BCFS.DE vs. AW10.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCFS.DEAW10.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

24.57%

-20.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.67%

17.11%

-13.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.67%

16.95%

-13.28%

BCFS.DE vs. AW10.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCFS.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than AW10.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BCFS.DE vs. AW10.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCFS.DE nor AW10.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BCFS.DE and AW10.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AW10.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AW10.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for BCFS.DE.

BCFS.DE is categorized as Options Trading, while AW10.DE is Global Equities. BCFS.DE tracks US Equity Defensive Put Write (EUR Hedged) Index, while AW10.DE tracks MSCI World Climate Paris Aligned. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BCFS.DE and 0.15% for AW10.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCFS.DE and AW10.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer