BCFB.DE vs. UIMA.DE
BCFB.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and UIMA.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - BCFB.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific ex Japan IMI Extended SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while UIMA.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BCFB.DE returned 7.78%/yr vs 13.82%/yr for UIMA.DE. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCFB.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for UIMA.DE.
Performance
BCFB.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFB.DE achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than UIMA.DE's 7.64% return.
BCFB.DE
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 4.36%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UIMA.DE
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 7.64%
- 6M
- 9.99%
- 1Y
- 16.53%
- 3Y*
- 13.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
BCFB.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFB.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 3.44% | 5.74% | 11.41% | 4.33% | -2.34% |
UIMA.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 7.64% | 20.65% | 8.36% | 15.54% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFB.DE and UIMA.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2022 | 0.71 |
The correlation between BCFB.DE and UIMA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFB.DE vs. UIMA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFB.DE
UIMA.DE
BCFB.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFB.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCFB.DE | UIMA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.24 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 1.75 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 6.51 | -3.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFB.DE | UIMA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.29 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.49 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
BCFB.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, smaller than the maximum UIMA.DE drawdown of -35.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFB.DE and UIMA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFB.DE | UIMA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -35.78% | +16.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.89% | -9.42% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.43% | -16.25% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -1.50% | -1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -5.66% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.53% | -0.21% |
Volatility
BCFB.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFB.DE) is 3.68%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMA.DE) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that BCFB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UIMA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFB.DE | UIMA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 4.30% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 10.54% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 12.75% | -0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 14.19% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 15.57% | -1.25% |
BCFB.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFB.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than UIMA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BCFB.DE vs. UIMA.DE - Dividend Comparison
BCFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UIMA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFB.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIMA.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 3.16% | 2.48% | 2.67% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 2.02% | 2.06% | 2.87% | 3.38% | 2.91% | 3.95% | 3.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFB.DE and UIMA.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIMA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIMA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BCFB.DE.
BCFB.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while UIMA.DE is Europe Equities. BCFB.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan IMI Extended SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while UIMA.DE tracks MSCI Europe. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BCFB.DE and 0.10% for UIMA.DE.
Find the right allocation for BCFB.DE and UIMA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer