PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIMA.DE vs. VNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIMA.DE vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMA.DE) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UIMA.DE is traded in EUR, while VNQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VNQ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIMA.DE achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly lower than VNQ's 11.01% return. Over the past 10 years, UIMA.DE has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 9.17%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.24% annualized return.


UIMA.DE

1D
0.62%
1M
3.43%
YTD
7.64%
6M
9.99%
1Y
16.53%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
9.17%

VNQ

1D
1.65%
1M
1.02%
YTD
11.01%
6M
9.22%
1Y
9.76%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
5.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIMA.DE vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UIMA.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
7.64%20.65%8.36%15.54%-9.27%24.93%-3.30%27.60%-11.02%11.02%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
11.01%-9.01%11.73%8.50%-21.68%51.05%-12.47%31.82%-1.62%-7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between UIMA.DE and VNQ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIMA.DE vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIMA.DE
UIMA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
UIMA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIMA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIMA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
UIMA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIMA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIMA.DE vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMA.DE) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIMA.DEVNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.14

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.40

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

3.57

+2.95

UIMA.DE vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIMA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIMA.DE and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIMA.DEVNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

0.76

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.19

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.25

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.24

+0.24

Drawdowns

UIMA.DE vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIMA.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.78%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -66.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIMA.DE and VNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIMA.DEVNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.78%

-66.71%

+30.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-7.01%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-20.46%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

-31.09%

+11.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.78%

-41.98%

+6.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-6.20%

+4.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-13.79%

+8.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.74%

-0.21%

Volatility

UIMA.DE vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UIMA.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) at 3.58%. This indicates that UIMA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIMA.DEVNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

3.58%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

9.35%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

12.96%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.19%

18.12%

-3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

20.88%

-5.31%

UIMA.DE vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIMA.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UIMA.DE vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

UIMA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than VNQ's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UIMA.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
3.16%2.48%2.67%2.74%2.91%2.02%2.06%2.87%3.38%2.91%3.95%3.24%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.63%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


UIMA.DE and VNQ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UIMA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UIMA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VNQ.

UIMA.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while VNQ is REIT. UIMA.DE tracks MSCI Europe, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for UIMA.DE and 0.13% for VNQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIMA.DE and VNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer