BCFB.DE vs. EXXW.DE
BCFB.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and EXXW.DE (iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - BCFB.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan IMI Extended SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while EXXW.DE tracks the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BCFB.DE returned 7.78%/yr vs 18.59%/yr for EXXW.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCFB.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EXXW.DE.
Performance
BCFB.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFB.DE achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than EXXW.DE's 13.56% return.
BCFB.DE
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 4.36%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EXXW.DE
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 14.04%
- 1Y
- 36.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
BCFB.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFB.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 3.44% | 5.74% | 11.41% | 4.33% | -2.34% |
EXXW.DE iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) | 13.56% | 15.94% | 13.25% | 9.56% | -0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFB.DE and EXXW.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2022 | 0.69 |
The correlation between BCFB.DE and EXXW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFB.DE vs. EXXW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFB.DE
EXXW.DE
BCFB.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFB.DE) and iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCFB.DE | EXXW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.53 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 5.69 | -4.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 20.43 | -17.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFB.DE | EXXW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 2.88 | -2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.28 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
BCFB.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, smaller than the maximum EXXW.DE drawdown of -66.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFB.DE and EXXW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFB.DE | EXXW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -66.89% | +47.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.89% | -6.34% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.43% | -20.10% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -2.21% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -11.54% | +6.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 1.77% | +0.55% |
Volatility
BCFB.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFB.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE) at 2.42%. This indicates that BCFB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXXW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFB.DE | EXXW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 2.42% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 8.92% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 12.53% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 13.38% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 15.81% | -1.49% |
BCFB.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFB.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EXXW.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCFB.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Dividend Comparison
BCFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXXW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFB.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EXXW.DE iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) | 4.04% | 4.60% | 5.32% | 5.98% | 7.16% | 5.56% | 4.64% | 5.67% | 5.04% | 7.91% | 4.27% | 5.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFB.DE and EXXW.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCFB.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EXXW.DE.
BCFB.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan IMI Extended SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while EXXW.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BCFB.DE and 0.31% for EXXW.DE.
Find the right allocation for BCFB.DE and EXXW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer