BCFB.DE vs. LGQK.DE
BCFB.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and LGQK.DE (Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - BCFB.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan IMI Extended SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while LGQK.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BCFB.DE returned 7.78%/yr vs 10.11%/yr for LGQK.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCFB.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LGQK.DE.
Performance
BCFB.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFB.DE achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than LGQK.DE's 9.03% return.
BCFB.DE
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 4.36%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LGQK.DE
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
BCFB.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFB.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 3.44% | 5.74% | 11.41% | 4.33% | -2.34% |
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 9.03% | 6.49% | 12.16% | 1.67% | -0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFB.DE and LGQK.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between BCFB.DE and LGQK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFB.DE vs. LGQK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFB.DE
LGQK.DE
BCFB.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFB.DE) and Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCFB.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 2.21 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 6.30 | -3.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFB.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.14 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.55 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
BCFB.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, smaller than the maximum LGQK.DE drawdown of -36.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFB.DE and LGQK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFB.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -36.96% | +17.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.89% | -6.26% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.43% | -20.04% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -2.16% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -6.18% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.20% | +0.12% |
Volatility
BCFB.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFB.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) at 3.20%. This indicates that BCFB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGQK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFB.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 3.20% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 9.32% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 12.16% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 14.67% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 25.08% | -10.76% |
BCFB.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFB.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than LGQK.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BCFB.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Dividend Comparison
BCFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LGQK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFB.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 2.64% | 2.88% | 5.33% | 3.78% | 4.41% | 3.15% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFB.DE and LGQK.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGQK.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGQK.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BCFB.DE.
BCFB.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan IMI Extended SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while LGQK.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BCFB.DE and 0.12% for LGQK.DE.
Find the right allocation for BCFB.DE and LGQK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer