BCFB.DE vs. SXR1.DE
BCFB.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and SXR1.DE (iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - BCFB.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan IMI Extended SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while SXR1.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BCFB.DE returned 7.78%/yr vs 10.41%/yr for SXR1.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCFB.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SXR1.DE.
Performance
BCFB.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFB.DE achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than SXR1.DE's 8.90% return.
BCFB.DE
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 4.36%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SXR1.DE
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 8.90%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 14.04%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
BCFB.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFB.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 3.44% | 5.74% | 11.41% | 4.33% | -2.34% |
SXR1.DE iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) | 8.90% | 7.00% | 11.91% | 2.20% | -0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFB.DE and SXR1.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between BCFB.DE and SXR1.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFB.DE vs. SXR1.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFB.DE
SXR1.DE
BCFB.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFB.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCFB.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.22 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 2.25 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 6.64 | -3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFB.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.19 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.27 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
BCFB.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, smaller than the maximum SXR1.DE drawdown of -38.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFB.DE and SXR1.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFB.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -38.62% | +19.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.89% | -6.21% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.43% | -20.28% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -2.17% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -9.79% | +5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.11% | +0.21% |
Volatility
BCFB.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFB.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) at 3.06%. This indicates that BCFB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXR1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFB.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 3.06% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 9.04% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 11.73% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 14.73% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 16.60% | -2.28% |
BCFB.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFB.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SXR1.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BCFB.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCFB.DE nor SXR1.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, BCFB.DE and SXR1.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BCFB.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SXR1.DE.
BCFB.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan IMI Extended SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while SXR1.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BCFB.DE and 0.20% for SXR1.DE.
Find the right allocation for BCFB.DE and SXR1.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer