BCFB.DE vs. IQQT.DE
BCFB.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - BCFB.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan IMI Extended SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while IQQT.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BCFB.DE returned 7.78%/yr vs 40.38%/yr for IQQT.DE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCFB.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IQQT.DE.
Performance
BCFB.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFB.DE achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than IQQT.DE's 70.08% return.
BCFB.DE
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 4.36%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 14.31%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 75.07%
- 1Y
- 111.86%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
BCFB.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFB.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 3.44% | 5.74% | 11.41% | 4.33% | -2.34% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -11.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFB.DE and IQQT.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2022 | 0.56 |
The correlation between BCFB.DE and IQQT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFB.DE vs. IQQT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFB.DE
IQQT.DE
BCFB.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFB.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCFB.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.72 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 12.46 | -11.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 35.53 | -32.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFB.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 4.62 | -4.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.48 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
BCFB.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, smaller than the maximum IQQT.DE drawdown of -57.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFB.DE and IQQT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFB.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -57.60% | +38.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.89% | -8.93% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.43% | -31.65% | +12.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -1.61% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -12.71% | +8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 3.14% | -0.82% |
Volatility
BCFB.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFB.DE) is 3.68%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that BCFB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFB.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 10.13% | -6.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 19.53% | -10.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 24.10% | -12.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 21.89% | -7.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 20.80% | -6.48% |
BCFB.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFB.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQT.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCFB.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Dividend Comparison
BCFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFB.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) IMI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFB.DE and IQQT.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCFB.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
BCFB.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan IMI Extended SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BCFB.DE and 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
Find the right allocation for BCFB.DE and IQQT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer