BCEM vs. EMDV

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

BCEM (Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF) and EMDV (ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. BCEM is actively managed, while EMDV is passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCEM charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EMDV.

Performance

BCEM vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF (BCEM) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCEM

• 1D: -2.97%
• 1M: 1.43%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMDV

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -1.28%
• 6M: -3.74%
• YTD: -2.71%
• 1Y: 0.70%
• 3Y*: 1.53%
• 5Y*: -2.91%
• 10Y*: 2.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCEM vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCEM Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF	6.53%
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	-3.85%

Correlation

The correlation between BCEM and EMDV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026	0.66

Return for Risk

BCEM vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCEM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EMDV

EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 9
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 9
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCEM vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF (BCEM) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCEM	EMDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.06	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.17	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.02	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.10	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.25	—

Drawdowns

BCEM vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCEM drawdown since its inception was -8.79%, smaller than the maximum EMDV drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCEM and EMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCEM	EMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.79%	-39.20%	+30.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.24%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.37%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.04%	-18.06%	+10.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.58%	-13.57%	+10.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCEM	EMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.70%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.92%	11.44%	+22.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.92%	15.45%	+18.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.92%	18.00%	+15.92%

BCEM vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCEM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCEM vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison

BCEM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BCEM Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	1.98%	2.46%	2.79%	1.88%	3.68%	2.12%	3.12%	2.38%	1.27%	2.09%	2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCEM and EMDV in my portfolio?

BCEM and EMDV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCEM or EMDV?

On fees, EMDV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCEM or EMDV?

EMDV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCEM or EMDV?

EMDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.00% for BCEM.

What is the main difference between BCEM and EMDV?

They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCEM and 0.60% for EMDV.