BCDF vs. XBCI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) and XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BCDF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XBCI.

Performance

BCDF vs. XBCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCDF

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 5.32%
• 6M: 1.82%
• YTD: 6.12%
• 1Y: 5.66%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.43%

XBCI

• 1D: -3.22%
• 1M: 3.82%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	$16.32K	$19.89K	$48.05K
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	$3.48M	$3.42M	$5.46M

BCDF vs. XBCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.63%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	-22.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BCDF and XBCI is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

BCDF vs. XBCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 18
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 20

XBCI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCDF vs. XBCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCDF	XBCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.39	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.24	—	—

Drawdowns

BCDF vs. XBCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCDF drawdown since its inception was -27.70%, smaller than the maximum XBCI drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCDF and XBCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCDF	XBCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.70%	-37.31%	+9.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.05%	-30.97%	+25.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.76%	-15.82%	+6.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCDF	XBCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.24%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.08%	62.61%	-47.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.87%	62.61%	-45.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.87%	62.61%	-45.74%

BCDF vs. XBCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCDF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than XBCI's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCDF vs. XBCI - Dividend Comparison

BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than XBCI's 26.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.38%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	26.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCDF and XBCI in my portfolio?

BCDF and XBCI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCDF or XBCI?

On fees, BCDF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCDF or XBCI?

BCDF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCDF or XBCI?

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 26.04%, compared with 2.38% for BCDF.

What is the main difference between BCDF and XBCI?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BCDF and 0.98% for XBCI.