BCDF vs. BFAP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) and BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCDF returned 2.25% vs -25.68% for BFAP. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCDF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFAP.

Performance

BCDF vs. BFAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCDF achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly higher than BFAP's -22.18% return.

BCDF

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -10.65%
• YTD: -0.15%
• 6M: -1.22%
• 1Y: 2.25%
• 3Y*: 14.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BFAP

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -7.11%
• YTD: -22.18%
• 6M: -22.50%
• 1Y: -25.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCDF vs. BFAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	-0.15%	10.71%
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	-22.18%	8.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BCDF and BFAP is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

BCDF vs. BFAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 11
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 11

BFAP

BFAP Risk / Return Rank: 1
BFAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BFAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BFAP Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCDF vs. BFAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCDF	BFAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	-1.20	+1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.31	-1.66	+1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.80	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.21	-0.77	+0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.58	-1.40	+1.98

BCDF vs. BFAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCDF Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is higher than the BFAP Sharpe Ratio of -1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCDF and BFAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCDF vs. BFAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCDF drawdown since its inception was -27.70%, smaller than the maximum BFAP drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCDF and BFAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCDF	BFAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.70%	-33.31%	+5.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.70%	-33.31%	+22.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.65%	-32.37%	+21.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.80%	-11.64%	+1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.87%	18.39%	-14.52%

Volatility

BCDF vs. BFAP - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) at 5.22%. This indicates that BCDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCDF	BFAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	5.22%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.42%	16.92%	-5.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.12%	21.43%	-6.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.94%	20.47%	-3.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	20.47%	-3.53%

BCDF vs. BFAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCDF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BFAP's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCDF vs. BFAP - Dividend Comparison

BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than BFAP's 24.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.53%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	24.38%	18.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCDF and BFAP in my portfolio?

BCDF and BFAP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCDF or BFAP?

BCDF has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to BFAP (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCDF dropped -27.70% vs BFAP's -33.31%.

Which ETF is better, BCDF or BFAP?

On 1-year performance, BCDF leads with 2.25% vs -25.68% for BFAP. On fees, BCDF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BFAP has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCDF or BFAP?

Over the 1-year period, BCDF has performed better with a 2.25% return vs -25.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCDF or BFAP?

BCDF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCDF or BFAP?

BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 24.38%, compared with 2.53% for BCDF.

What is the main difference between BCDF and BFAP?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BCDF and 0.90% for BFAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.