PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCD vs. ZTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCD vs. ZTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCD achieves a 14.86% return, which is significantly higher than ZTWO's 1.10% return.


BCD

1D
1.14%
1M
-0.08%
6M
10.85%
YTD
14.86%
1Y
23.27%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*

ZTWO

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.11%
6M
1.07%
YTD
1.10%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCD vs. ZTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCD and ZTWO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

-0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCD vs. ZTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCD
BCD Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCD Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTWO
ZTWO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCD vs. ZTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCDZTWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.54

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

3.89

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.34

18.27

-11.93

BCD vs. ZTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCD Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the ZTWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCD and ZTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCD vs. ZTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCD drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, which is greater than ZTWO's maximum drawdown of -0.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCD and ZTWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCDZTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.81%

-0.93%

-28.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-0.93%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.07%

-0.24%

-7.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

-0.10%

-9.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

0.20%

+3.48%

Volatility

BCD vs. ZTWO - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) at 0.49%. This indicates that BCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCDZTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

0.49%

+3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

1.06%

+10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.12%

1.36%

+12.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

1.50%

+13.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

1.50%

+12.42%

BCD vs. ZTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTWO's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCD vs. ZTWO - Dividend Comparison

BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.99%, more than ZTWO's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
14.99%17.21%3.60%4.51%5.21%8.30%1.29%1.55%1.59%0.07%
ZTWO
F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.08%4.31%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCD and ZTWO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCD has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to ZTWO (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCD dropped -29.81% vs ZTWO's -0.93%.

On 1-year performance, BCD leads with 23.27% vs 3.62% for ZTWO. On fees, ZTWO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ZTWO has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BCD has performed better with a 23.27% return vs 3.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZTWO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BCD.

BCD has the higher dividend yield at 14.99%, compared with 4.08% for ZTWO.

BCD is categorized as Commodities, while ZTWO is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for BCD and 0.15% for ZTWO.

ZTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCD and ZTWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer