BCD vs. SCMB
BCD (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCD is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return, while SCMB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BCD returned 10.83%/yr vs 2.76%/yr for SCMB. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BCD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.
Performance
BCD vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCD achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 0.06% return.
BCD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 7.33%
- YTD
- 16.41%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.82%
SCMB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 2.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.39M | $1.55M | $2.26M | |
| $37.46M | $30.33M | $30.04M |
BCD vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 16.41% | 15.71% | 6.20% | -7.58% | 1.53% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 0.06% | 3.78% | 0.91% | 5.86% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCD and SCMB is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | -0.04 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BCD and SCMB has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.24, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCD vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank
BCD
SCMB
BCD vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCD | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 1.79 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | 5.53 | +1.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCD vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCD drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCD and SCMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCD | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.81% | -6.13% | -23.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -2.92% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.70% | -4.75% | -7.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.83% | -1.86% | -4.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -1.30% | -8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 0.94% | +2.94% |
Volatility
BCD vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) at 1.02%. This indicates that BCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCD | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 1.02% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 2.35% | +9.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.22% | 3.01% | +11.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 4.12% | +11.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 4.12% | +9.79% |
BCD vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCD vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison
BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.79%, more than SCMB's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.79% | 17.21% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.26% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCD and SCMB have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCD has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to SCMB (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCD dropped -29.81% vs SCMB's -6.13%.
On 3-year performance, BCD leads with 10.83% vs 2.76% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BCD has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 2.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BCD.
BCD has the higher dividend yield at 14.79%, compared with 3.26% for SCMB.
BCD is categorized as Commodities, while SCMB is Municipal Bonds. BCD tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return, while SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BCD and 0.03% for SCMB.
BCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCD and SCMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer