BCD vs. KCE
BCD (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF) and KCE (SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCD is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen, while KCE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index. BCD is actively managed, while KCE is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BCD returned 10.63%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for KCE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KCE.
Performance
BCD vs. KCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCD achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly higher than KCE's 2.72% return.
BCD
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -7.90%
- YTD
- 11.14%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- 18.61%
- 3Y*
- 10.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- —
KCE
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 2.72%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- 17.98%
BCD vs. KCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 11.14% | 15.71% | 6.20% | -7.58% | 18.38% | 31.87% | 4.76% | 7.34% | -8.65% | 3.83% |
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 2.72% | 10.76% | 37.51% | 32.04% | -22.14% | 40.05% | 30.82% | 27.13% | -15.63% | 25.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCD and KCE is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2017 | 0.20 |
The correlation between BCD and KCE shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCD vs. KCE — Risk / Return Rank
BCD
KCE
BCD vs. KCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCD | KCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.12 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 0.71 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.74 | 1.85 | +4.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCD vs. KCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCD drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, smaller than the maximum KCE drawdown of -74.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCD and KCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCD | KCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.81% | -74.00% | +44.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.04% | -17.44% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.04% | -26.31% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.03% | -34.45% | +11.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.04% | -4.62% | -6.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.84% | -22.76% | +12.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 6.71% | -3.91% |
Volatility
BCD vs. KCE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) is 3.34%, while SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that BCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCD | KCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 5.66% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.01% | 15.31% | -3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.99% | 19.97% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 23.05% | -7.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 22.95% | -9.05% |
BCD vs. KCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than KCE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCD vs. KCE - Dividend Comparison
BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.49%, more than KCE's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 15.49% | 17.21% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 1.76% | 1.63% | 1.56% | 1.82% | 2.42% | 1.53% | 2.20% | 2.32% | 2.67% | 1.95% | 2.30% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCD and KCE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KCE has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to BCD (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCD dropped -29.81% vs KCE's -74.00%.
On 5-year performance, KCE leads with 12.47% vs 10.63% for BCD. On fees, BCD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, BCD has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KCE has performed better with a 12.47% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BCD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KCE.
BCD has the higher dividend yield at 15.49%, compared with 1.76% for KCE.
BCD is categorized as Commodities, while KCE is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for BCD and 0.35% for KCE.
BCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCD and KCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer