PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCD vs. BWET
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BCD vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BCD vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
15.57%15.71%6.20%-0.04%
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
411.30%96.22%-39.21%15.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCD achieves a 15.57% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 411.30% return.


BCD

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.50%
YTD
15.57%
6M
21.94%
1Y
22.76%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*

BWET

1D
-19.47%
1M
71.90%
YTD
411.30%
6M
568.02%
1Y
802.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BCD vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BCD vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCD
BCD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BWET
BWET Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCD vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCDBWETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

9.77

-8.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

5.78

-3.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.86

-0.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

27.62

-25.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.58

78.05

-70.48

BCD vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCD Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 9.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCD and BWET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCDBWETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

9.77

-8.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

1.50

-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between BCD and BWET is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BCD vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.89%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
14.89%17.21%3.60%4.51%5.21%8.30%1.29%1.55%1.59%0.07%
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BCD vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCD drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCD and BWET.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BCDBWETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.81%

-56.90%

+27.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-28.84%

+19.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-19.47%

+16.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-24.74%

+14.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

10.21%

-7.10%

Volatility

BCD vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) is 5.53%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 51.89%. This indicates that BCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BCDBWETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

51.89%

-46.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

72.97%

-61.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.15%

83.00%

-67.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

64.49%

-49.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.93%

64.49%

-50.56%