BCCL.NEO vs. EBIT.TO
BCCL.NEO (Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and EBIT.TO (Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BCCL.NEO is actively managed, while EBIT.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, BCCL.NEO returned -45.87% vs -44.48% for EBIT.TO. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BCCL.NEO charges 1.78%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for EBIT.TO.
Performance
BCCL.NEO vs. EBIT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BCCL.NEO having a -28.69% return and EBIT.TO slightly higher at -27.29%.
BCCL.NEO
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- 6M
- -18.01%
- YTD
- -28.69%
- 1Y
- -45.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -28.13%
EBIT.TO
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- 6M
- -17.83%
- YTD
- -27.29%
- 1Y
- -44.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$76.07K | CA$135.25K | CA$227.19K | |
EBIT.TO Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD | CA$283.51K | CA$498.45K | CA$1.05M |
BCCL.NEO vs. EBIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -28.69% | -6.82% |
EBIT.TO Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD | -27.29% | -11.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCCL.NEO and EBIT.TO is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025 | 0.92 |
The correlation between BCCL.NEO and EBIT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCCL.NEO vs. EBIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BCCL.NEO
EBIT.TO
BCCL.NEO vs. EBIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) and Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCCL.NEO | EBIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.88 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -1.31 | -0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCCL.NEO vs. EBIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCCL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.27%, smaller than the maximum EBIT.TO drawdown of -75.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCL.NEO and EBIT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCCL.NEO | EBIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.27% | -75.45% | +20.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.27% | -53.08% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -75.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.47% | -50.33% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.18% | -33.53% | +7.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.35% | 35.45% | +0.90% |
Volatility
BCCL.NEO vs. EBIT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) at 8.18%. This indicates that BCCL.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBIT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCCL.NEO | EBIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.77% | 8.18% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.62% | 33.44% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.76% | 43.81% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.50% | 51.89% | -7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.50% | 54.35% | -9.85% |
BCCL.NEO vs. EBIT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCCL.NEO has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than EBIT.TO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCCL.NEO vs. EBIT.TO - Dividend Comparison
BCCL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.98%, while EBIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 43.98% | 16.02% |
EBIT.TO Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BCCL.NEO and EBIT.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EBIT.TO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EBIT.TO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.78% for BCCL.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 1.78% for BCCL.NEO and 0.75% for EBIT.TO.
Find the right allocation for BCCL.NEO and EBIT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer