BCCL.NEO vs. BCCC
BCCL.NEO (Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCCL.NEO returned -45.87% vs -32.27% for BCCC. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BCCL.NEO charges 1.78%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCCC.
Performance
BCCL.NEO vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BCCL.NEO is traded in CAD, while BCCC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCCC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCCL.NEO achieves a -28.69% return, which is significantly lower than BCCC's -18.92% return.
BCCL.NEO
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- 6M
- -18.01%
- YTD
- -28.69%
- 1Y
- -45.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -28.13%
BCCC
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- 6M
- -8.95%
- YTD
- -18.92%
- 1Y
- -32.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -21.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$168.22K | CA$164.56K | CA$229.24K | |
| CA$76.07K | CA$135.25K | CA$227.19K |
BCCL.NEO vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -28.69% | -17.69% |
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -18.92% | -7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCCL.NEO and BCCC is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | 0.88 |
The correlation between BCCL.NEO and BCCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCCL.NEO vs. BCCC — Risk / Return Rank
BCCL.NEO
BCCC
BCCL.NEO vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCCL.NEO | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.85 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.76 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -1.21 | -0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCCL.NEO vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCCL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.27%, which is greater than BCCC's maximum drawdown of -42.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCL.NEO and BCCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCCL.NEO | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.27% | -42.86% | -12.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.27% | -42.86% | -12.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.47% | -36.45% | -15.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.18% | -20.13% | -6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.35% | 26.63% | +9.72% |
Volatility
BCCL.NEO vs. BCCC - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) at 6.05%. This indicates that BCCL.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCCL.NEO | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.77% | 6.05% | +2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.62% | 28.20% | +5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.76% | 35.93% | +10.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.50% | 34.45% | +10.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.50% | 34.45% | +10.05% |
BCCL.NEO vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCCL.NEO has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCCL.NEO vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison
BCCL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.98%, less than BCCC's 59.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 59.49% | 29.55% |
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 43.98% | 16.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCCL.NEO and BCCC have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCCC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCCC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.78% for BCCL.NEO.
Their fees differ too: 1.78% for BCCL.NEO and 0.75% for BCCC.
Find the right allocation for BCCL.NEO and BCCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer