BCCC vs. WGMI
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI).
BCCC and WGMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCCC is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jun 3, 2025. WGMI is an actively managed fund by Valkyrie. It was launched on Feb 7, 2022.
Performance
BCCC vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCCC vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -18.13% | -7.14% |
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | -8.91% | 99.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCCC achieves a -18.13% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's -8.91% return.
BCCC
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- -18.13%
- 6M
- -32.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WGMI
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -13.78%
- YTD
- -8.91%
- 6M
- -22.65%
- 1Y
- 155.01%
- 3Y*
- 55.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCCC vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BCCC and WGMI have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Return for Risk
BCCC vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank
BCCC
WGMI
BCCC vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCCC | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.78 | 0.08 | -0.86 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCCC and WGMI is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BCCC vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison
BCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.24%, while WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 51.24% | 29.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.31% |
Drawdowns
BCCC vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCCC drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCC and WGMI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCCC | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.62% | -85.76% | +44.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -50.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.57% | -47.10% | +12.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -43.87% | +29.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 23.36% | — |
Volatility
BCCC vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCCC | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 60.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.57% | 78.21% | -41.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.57% | 82.07% | -45.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.57% | 82.07% | -45.50% |