BCCC vs. WGMI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and WGMI (Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCCC returned -28.98% vs 261.44% for WGMI. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

BCCC vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCCC achieves a -23.52% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 81.24% return.

BCCC

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: -18.36%
• YTD: -23.52%
• 6M: -24.11%
• 1Y: -28.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WGMI

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: 25.79%
• YTD: 81.24%
• 6M: 46.67%
• 1Y: 261.44%
• 3Y*: 88.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCCC vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	-23.52%	-7.14%
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	81.24%	99.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BCCC and WGMI is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.56

Return for Risk

BCCC vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 77
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCCC vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCCC	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.83	0.30	-1.13

Drawdowns

BCCC vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCCC drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCC and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCCC	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.62%	-85.76%	+44.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.62%	-50.94%	+9.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-62.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.88%	-3.01%	-35.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.93%	-42.86%	+25.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	25.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCCC	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.90%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	55.08%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.09%	75.99%	-40.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.09%	81.50%	-46.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.09%	81.50%	-46.41%

BCCC vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BCCC and WGMI have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

BCCC vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

BCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.17%, while WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	64.17%	29.55%	0.00%	0.00%
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCCC and WGMI in my portfolio?

BCCC and WGMI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCCC or WGMI?

On 1-year performance, WGMI leads with 261.44% vs -28.98% for BCCC. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCCC or WGMI?

Over the 1-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 261.44% return vs -28.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCCC or WGMI?

BCCC and WGMI have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCCC or WGMI?

BCCC has the higher dividend yield at 64.17%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.

What is the main difference between BCCC and WGMI?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Valkyrie.