BCCC vs. HBIX.NEO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO).

BCCC and HBIX.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCCC is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jun 3, 2025. HBIX.NEO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Apr 28, 2025.

Performance

BCCC vs. HBIX.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BCCC vs. HBIX.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	-18.13%	-7.14%
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	-24.95%	-17.87%

Different Trading Currencies

BCCC is traded in USD, while HBIX.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the HBIX.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCCC achieves a -18.13% return, which is significantly higher than HBIX.NEO's -24.95% return.

BCCC

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: -18.13%
• 6M: -32.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HBIX.NEO

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: -24.95%
• 6M: -46.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCCC vs. HBIX.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCCC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HBIX.NEO's 0.65% expense ratio.

BCCC

Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF

HBIX.NEO

Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF

Return for Risk

BCCC vs. HBIX.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCCC	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.78	-0.60	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between BCCC and HBIX.NEO is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BCCC vs. HBIX.NEO - Dividend Comparison

BCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.24%, more than HBIX.NEO's 37.84% yield.

	TTM	2025
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	51.24%	29.55%
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	37.84%	20.21%

Drawdowns

BCCC vs. HBIX.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCCC drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, smaller than the maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown of -55.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCC and HBIX.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCCC	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.62%	-55.90%	+14.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.57%	-49.72%	+15.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.34%	-19.91%	+5.57%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCCC	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.57%	53.58%	-17.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.57%	53.58%	-17.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.57%	53.58%	-17.01%