BCCC vs. CBOL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCCC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Global X, while CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCCC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CBOL.

Performance

BCCC vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCCC achieves a -22.13% return, which is significantly lower than CBOL's -2.05% return.

BCCC

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: -13.01%
• YTD: -22.13%
• 6M: -21.74%
• 1Y: -27.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBOL

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: -2.05%
• 6M: -2.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCCC vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	-22.13%	-15.13%
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF	-2.05%	-2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BCCC and CBOL is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.90

Return for Risk

BCCC vs. CBOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCCC

BCCC Risk / Return Rank: 3
BCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CBOL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCCC vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCCC	CBOL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	—	—

Drawdowns

BCCC vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCCC drawdown since its inception was -41.63%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -5.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCC and CBOL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCCC	CBOL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.63%	-5.05%	-36.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.76%	-4.66%	-33.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.79%	-3.29%	-14.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCCC	CBOL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.36%	3.84%	+31.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.08%	3.84%	+31.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.08%	3.84%	+31.24%

BCCC vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCCC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCCC vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison

BCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.45%, more than CBOL's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	64.45%	29.55%
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF	1.83%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCCC and CBOL in my portfolio?

BCCC and CBOL have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCCC or CBOL?

On fees, BCCC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCCC or CBOL?

BCCC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CBOL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCCC or CBOL?

BCCC has the higher dividend yield at 64.45%, compared with 1.83% for CBOL.

What is the main difference between BCCC and CBOL?

BCCC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCCC and 0.79% for CBOL.