BCAAX vs. FAHCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCAAX (BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund) and FAHCX (Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, BCAAX returned 7.34%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for FAHCX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCAAX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FAHCX.

Performance

BCAAX vs. FAHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCAAX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than FAHCX's 7.59% return.

BCAAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.33%
• 6M: 0.76%
• 1Y: 4.40%
• 3Y*: 7.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FAHCX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 2.15%
• YTD: 7.59%
• 6M: 8.53%
• 1Y: 16.85%
• 3Y*: 12.32%
• 5Y*: 6.58%
• 10Y*: 7.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCAAX vs. FAHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BCAAX BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund	0.33%	5.27%	8.92%	11.47%	-9.47%	1.04%
FAHCX Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I	7.59%	12.06%	9.50%	12.15%	-11.15%	2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BCAAX and FAHCX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021	0.72

The correlation between BCAAX and FAHCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BCAAX vs. FAHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCAAX

BCAAX Risk / Return Rank: 35
BCAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BCAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
BCAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
BCAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BCAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

FAHCX

FAHCX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FAHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FAHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FAHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FAHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FAHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCAAX vs. FAHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCAAX	FAHCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	3.20	-1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	4.71	-1.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.64	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	5.71	-3.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.84	23.97	-16.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCAAX vs. FAHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the FAHCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAAX and FAHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCAAX	FAHCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	3.20	-1.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.98	-0.14

Drawdowns

BCAAX vs. FAHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAAX drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, smaller than the maximum FAHCX drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAAX and FAHCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCAAX	FAHCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.21%	-48.10%	+34.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.48%	-3.13%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.71%	-6.98%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.01%	-4.62%	+1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.57%	0.74%	-0.17%

Volatility

BCAAX vs. FAHCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) is 0.82%, while Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that BCAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCAAX	FAHCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.82%	1.70%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.22%	4.35%	-2.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86%	5.58%	-2.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.04%	6.38%	-2.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.04%	7.63%	-3.59%

BCAAX vs. FAHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCAAX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FAHCX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCAAX vs. FAHCX - Dividend Comparison

BCAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than FAHCX's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCAAX BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund	5.61%	6.27%	6.87%	4.68%	4.99%	3.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FAHCX Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I	4.38%	4.73%	4.18%	4.70%	7.35%	4.94%	3.70%	4.51%	6.09%	4.95%	5.53%	4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCAAX and FAHCX in my portfolio?

BCAAX and FAHCX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCAAX or FAHCX?

FAHCX has higher volatility (1.70%) compared to BCAAX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAAX dropped -13.21% vs FAHCX's -48.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.